Demographics details for Ash fork, AZ vs Gladewater, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ash fork, AZ vs Gladewater, TX.
| Data | Ash fork | Gladewater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 466 | 6,230 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 33.3 years |
| Median Income | $79,861 | $47,749 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Ash fork vs Gladewater
- The population in Gladewater is higher at 6,230, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- Residents in Ash fork have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 33.3 years in Gladewater.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861 compared to $47,749 in Gladewater.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ash fork at 50.0% compared to 26.0% in Gladewater.
- The poverty level is identical in both Ash fork and Gladewater at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Ash fork is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.2% in Gladewater.
Demographics
Demographics Ash fork vs Gladewater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ash fork | Gladewater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 17 |
| White | 79 | 61 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ash fork vs Gladewater
- In Gladewater, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 61% in Gladewater.
- In Gladewater, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ash fork.
- Gladewater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 6% in Ash fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ash fork at 15% compared to 6% in Gladewater.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ash fork and Gladewater at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ash fork | Gladewater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ash fork vs Gladewater
- In Gladewater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 18.4% in Ash fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gladewater at 25.8% versus 21.4% in Ash fork.
- Gladewater has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 19.3% in Ash fork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gladewater at 17.5% compared to 15.9% in Ash fork.
- Gladewater has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 18.0% in Gladewater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ash fork | Gladewater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (61) | 18.2% (1,135) |
| Less than High School | 23.6% (110) | 24.6% (1,532) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (41) | 7.6% (474) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ash fork vs Gladewater
- In Gladewater, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- In Gladewater, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 13.1% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gladewater at 24.6%, compared to 23.6% in Ash fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ash fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.8% compared to 7.6% in Gladewater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.