Demographics details for Ash fork, AZ vs Costa mesa, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ash fork, AZ vs Costa mesa, CA.
| Data | Ash fork | Costa mesa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 466 | 109,521 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $79,861 | $104,981 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Ash fork vs Costa mesa
- The population in Costa mesa is higher at 109,521, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- Residents in Ash fork have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 36.4 years in Costa mesa.
- Costa mesa has a higher median income of $104,981, compared to $79,861 in Ash fork.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ash fork at 50.0% compared to 36.0% in Costa mesa.
- Ash fork has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Costa mesa.
- The unemployment rate in Ash fork is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.6% in Costa mesa.
Demographics
Demographics Ash fork vs Costa mesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ash fork | Costa mesa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 79 | 40 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ash fork vs Costa mesa
- In Costa mesa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 40% in Costa mesa.
- In Costa mesa, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Ash fork.
- Costa mesa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 6% in Ash fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ash fork at 15% compared to 12% in Costa mesa.
- In Costa mesa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ash fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ash fork | Costa mesa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 10.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 27.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ash fork vs Costa mesa
- More residents in Ash fork report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.2% in Costa mesa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ash fork at 21.4% compared to 18.5% in Costa mesa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ash fork at 19.3% compared to 10.9% in Costa mesa.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Costa mesa at 17.1% compared to 15.9% in Ash fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ash fork at 30.6% compared to 27.6% in Costa mesa.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 8.0% in Costa mesa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ash fork | Costa mesa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (2,006) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (61) | 11.3% (12,406) |
| Less than High School | 23.6% (110) | 17.3% (18,969) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (41) | 31.2% (34,140) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ash fork vs Costa mesa
- In Costa mesa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ash fork hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 11.3% in Costa mesa.
- More residents in Ash fork have less than a high school education at 23.6% compared to 17.3% in Costa mesa.
- In Costa mesa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.2% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.