Demographics details for Arvin, CA vs Laconia, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arvin, CA vs Laconia, NH.
| Data | Arvin | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,611 | 17,086 |
| Median Age | 24.9 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $47,997 | $67,856 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 25% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 2.4 |
Population Comparison: Arvin vs Laconia
- In Arvin, the population is higher at 19,611, compared to 17,086 in Laconia.
- The median age in Laconia is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 24.9 years in Arvin.
- Laconia has a higher median income of $67,856, compared to $47,997 in Arvin.
- In Laconia, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Arvin.
- Arvin has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 9% in Laconia.
- The unemployment rate in Arvin is higher at 6.2%, compared to 2.4% in Laconia.
Demographics
Demographics Arvin vs Laconia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arvin | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | -19 | 93 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 95 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arvin vs Laconia
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Arvin and Laconia at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laconia at 93% compared to -19% in Arvin.
- Both Arvin and Laconia have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arvin at 95% compared to 3% in Laconia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Arvin at 21% compared to 2% in Laconia.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Arvin at 1% compared to 0% in Laconia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arvin | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 19.9% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 21.0% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 42.4% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arvin vs Laconia
- More residents in Arvin report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 16.9% in Laconia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laconia at 24.9% versus 20.1% in Arvin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Arvin at 21.0% compared to 17.2% in Laconia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Laconia at 16.6% compared to 13.5% in Arvin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Arvin at 42.4% compared to 31.5% in Laconia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laconia at 18.0% compared to 6.0% in Arvin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arvin | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.3% (840) | 0.4% (61) |
| High School Diploma | 11.8% (2,305) | 18.9% (3,229) |
| Less than High School | 53.7% (10,540) | 12.6% (2,158) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.0% (383) | 19.7% (3,364) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arvin vs Laconia
- A higher percentage of residents in Arvin have no formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.4% in Laconia.
- In Laconia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 11.8% in Arvin.
- More residents in Arvin have less than a high school education at 53.7% compared to 12.6% in Laconia.
- In Laconia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 2.0% in Arvin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.