Demographics details for Arvin, CA vs Grand rapids, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arvin, CA vs Grand rapids, MI.
Data | Arvin | Grand rapids |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,611 | 196,908 |
Median Age | 24.9 years | 31.8 years |
Median Income | $47,997 | $61,634 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 25% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Arvin vs Grand rapids
- The population in Grand rapids is higher at 196,908, compared to 19,611 in Arvin.
- The median age in Grand rapids is higher at 31.8 years, compared to 24.9 years in Arvin.
- Grand rapids has a higher median income of $61,634, compared to $47,997 in Arvin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Arvin at 32.0% compared to 31.0% in Grand rapids.
- Arvin has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 14% in Grand rapids.
- The unemployment rate in Arvin is higher at 6.2%, compared to 5.3% in Grand rapids.
Demographics
Demographics Arvin vs Grand rapids provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Arvin | Grand rapids |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 18 |
White | -19 | 51 |
Asian | 1 | 3 |
Hispanic | 95 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 21 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Arvin vs Grand rapids
- In Grand rapids, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 1% in Arvin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grand rapids at 51% compared to -19% in Arvin.
- In Grand rapids, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Arvin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arvin at 95% compared to 16% in Grand rapids.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Arvin at 21% compared to 11% in Grand rapids.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arvin and Grand rapids at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Arvin | Grand rapids |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 19.9% | 11.5% |
Depression | 20.1% | 25.3% |
Smoking | 21.0% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 42.4% | 34.9% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arvin vs Grand rapids
- More residents in Arvin report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.6% in Grand rapids.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grand rapids at 25.3% versus 20.1% in Arvin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Arvin at 21.0% compared to 17.3% in Grand rapids.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand rapids at 16.7% compared to 13.5% in Arvin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Arvin at 42.4% compared to 34.9% in Grand rapids.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand rapids at 12.0% compared to 6.0% in Arvin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Arvin | Grand rapids |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.3% (840) | 1.2% (2,304) |
High School Diploma | 11.8% (2,305) | 12.4% (24,420) |
Less than High School | 53.7% (10,540) | 12.2% (23,971) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.0% (383) | 25.6% (50,441) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arvin vs Grand rapids
- A higher percentage of residents in Arvin have no formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 1.2% in Grand rapids.
- In Grand rapids, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.4% compared to 11.8% in Arvin.
- More residents in Arvin have less than a high school education at 53.7% compared to 12.2% in Grand rapids.
- In Grand rapids, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 2.0% in Arvin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.