Demographics details for Arvin, CA vs Elk city, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arvin, CA vs Elk city, KS.
Data | Arvin | Elk city |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,611 | 257 |
Median Age | 24.9 years | 45.9 years |
Median Income | $47,997 | $31,250 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 25% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Arvin vs Elk city
- In Arvin, the population is higher at 19,611, compared to 257 in Elk city.
- The median age in Elk city is higher at 45.9 years, compared to 24.9 years in Arvin.
- Arvin has a higher median income of $47,997 compared to $31,250 in Elk city.
- In Elk city, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 32.0% in Arvin.
- Arvin has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 14% in Elk city.
- The unemployment rate in Arvin is higher at 6.2%, compared to 4.0% in Elk city.
Demographics
Demographics Arvin vs Elk city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Arvin | Elk city |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | -19 | 87 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 95 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 21 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arvin vs Elk city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Arvin at 1% compared to 0% in Elk city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Elk city at 87% compared to -19% in Arvin.
- The Asian population is larger in Arvin at 1% compared to 0% in Elk city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arvin at 95% compared to 5% in Elk city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Arvin at 21% compared to 8% in Elk city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Arvin at 1% compared to 0% in Elk city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Arvin | Elk city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 19.9% | 10.9% |
Depression | 20.1% | 22.6% |
Smoking | 21.0% | 19.5% |
Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 19.7% |
Obesity | 42.4% | 41.7% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arvin vs Elk city
- More residents in Arvin report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.1% in Elk city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Elk city at 22.6% versus 20.1% in Arvin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Arvin at 21.0% compared to 19.5% in Elk city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Elk city at 19.7% compared to 13.5% in Arvin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Arvin at 42.4% compared to 41.7% in Elk city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Elk city at 28.0% compared to 6.0% in Arvin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Arvin | Elk city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.3% (840) | 0.8% (2) |
High School Diploma | 11.8% (2,305) | 21.8% (56) |
Less than High School | 53.7% (10,540) | 13.6% (35) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.0% (383) | 3.5% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arvin vs Elk city
- A higher percentage of residents in Arvin have no formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.8% in Elk city.
- In Elk city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.8% compared to 11.8% in Arvin.
- More residents in Arvin have less than a high school education at 53.7% compared to 13.6% in Elk city.
- In Elk city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 3.5% compared to 2.0% in Arvin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.