Demographics details for Arvada, CO vs Woods hole, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arvada, CO vs Woods hole, MA.
| Data | Arvada | Woods hole |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 121,581 | 992 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 65.8 years |
| Median Income | $106,014 | $72,031 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Arvada vs Woods hole
- In Arvada, the population is higher at 121,581, compared to 992 in Woods hole.
- The median age in Woods hole is higher at 65.8 years, compared to 40.2 years in Arvada.
- Arvada has a higher median income of $106,014 compared to $72,031 in Woods hole.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Arvada at 46.0% compared to 36.0% in Woods hole.
- Arvada has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Woods hole.
- The unemployment rate in Arvada is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Woods hole.
Demographics
Demographics Arvada vs Woods hole provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arvada | Woods hole |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 73 | 96 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arvada vs Woods hole
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Arvada at 1% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woods hole at 96% compared to 73% in Arvada.
- The Asian population is larger in Arvada at 2% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arvada at 15% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Arvada at 9% compared to 4% in Woods hole.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arvada and Woods hole at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arvada | Woods hole |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 7.3% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 21.5% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 9.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 24.6% | 26.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arvada vs Woods hole
- More residents in Arvada report poor mental health at 14.3% compared to 13.8% in Woods hole.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woods hole at 21.5% versus 20.9% in Arvada.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Arvada at 13.8% compared to 9.5% in Woods hole.
- Binge drinking is more common in Arvada at 22.1% compared to 19.3% in Woods hole.
- Woods hole has higher obesity rates at 26.0% compared to 24.6% in Arvada.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woods hole at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Arvada.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arvada | Woods hole |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (483) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.7% (15,387) | 7.4% (73) |
| Less than High School | 6.6% (8,032) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.1% (42,624) | 67.2% (667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arvada vs Woods hole
- A higher percentage of residents in Arvada have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arvada hold a high school diploma at 12.7% compared to 7.4% in Woods hole.
- More residents in Arvada have less than a high school education at 6.6% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
- In Woods hole, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 67.2% compared to 35.1% in Arvada.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.