Demographics details for Arvada, CO vs Pittsfield, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arvada, CO vs Pittsfield, NH.
Data | Arvada | Pittsfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 121,581 | 4,140 |
Median Age | 40.2 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $106,014 | $64,600 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Arvada vs Pittsfield
- In Arvada, the population is higher at 121,581, compared to 4,140 in Pittsfield.
- The median age in Pittsfield is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 40.2 years in Arvada.
- Arvada has a higher median income of $106,014 compared to $64,600 in Pittsfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Arvada at 46.0% compared to 33.0% in Pittsfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Pittsfield at 8%, compared to 6% in Arvada.
- The unemployment rate in Arvada is higher at 3.8%, compared to 2.6% in Pittsfield.
Demographics
Demographics Arvada vs Pittsfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Arvada | Pittsfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 73 | 100 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 15 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 9 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arvada vs Pittsfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Arvada at 1% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pittsfield at 100% compared to 73% in Arvada.
- The Asian population is larger in Arvada at 2% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arvada at 15% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Arvada at 9% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arvada and Pittsfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Arvada | Pittsfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 20.9% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 13.8% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 22.1% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 24.6% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arvada vs Pittsfield
- More residents in Arvada report poor mental health at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Arvada at 20.9% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Arvada at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Arvada at 22.1% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Arvada at 24.6% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Arvada at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Arvada | Pittsfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (483) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 12.7% (15,387) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 6.6% (8,032) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.1% (42,624) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arvada vs Pittsfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Arvada have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arvada hold a high school diploma at 12.7% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
- More residents in Arvada have less than a high school education at 6.6% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arvada hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.1% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.