Demographics details for Arvada, CO vs Max meadows, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arvada, CO vs Max meadows, VA.
| Data | Arvada | Max meadows |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 121,581 | 580 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 47.2 years |
| Median Income | $106,014 | $73,683 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Arvada vs Max meadows
- In Arvada, the population is higher at 121,581, compared to 580 in Max meadows.
- The median age in Max meadows is higher at 47.2 years, compared to 40.2 years in Arvada.
- Arvada has a higher median income of $106,014 compared to $73,683 in Max meadows.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Arvada at 46.0% compared to 43.0% in Max meadows.
- Arvada has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Max meadows.
- The unemployment rate in Arvada is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Max meadows.
Demographics
Demographics Arvada vs Max meadows provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arvada | Max meadows |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 73 | 98 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arvada vs Max meadows
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Arvada at 1% compared to 0% in Max meadows.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Max meadows at 98% compared to 73% in Arvada.
- The Asian population is larger in Arvada at 2% compared to 0% in Max meadows.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arvada at 15% compared to 0% in Max meadows.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Arvada at 9% compared to 2% in Max meadows.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arvada and Max meadows at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arvada | Max meadows |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 24.6% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arvada vs Max meadows
- In Max meadows, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.3% in Arvada.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Max meadows at 26.2% versus 20.9% in Arvada.
- Max meadows has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 13.8% in Arvada.
- Binge drinking is more common in Arvada at 22.1% compared to 17.9% in Max meadows.
- Max meadows has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 24.6% in Arvada.
- Disability percentages are higher in Arvada at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Max meadows.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arvada | Max meadows |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (483) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.7% (15,387) | 37.1% (215) |
| Less than High School | 6.6% (8,032) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.1% (42,624) | 9.8% (57) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arvada vs Max meadows
- A higher percentage of residents in Arvada have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Max meadows.
- In Max meadows, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 37.1% compared to 12.7% in Arvada.
- More residents in Arvada have less than a high school education at 6.6% compared to 0.0% in Max meadows.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arvada hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.1% compared to 9.8% in Max meadows.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.