Demographics details for Arrington, VA vs South pasadena, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arrington, VA vs South pasadena, CA.
| Data | Arrington | South pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,226 | 25,850 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $58,144 | $127,882 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Arrington vs South pasadena
- The population in South pasadena is higher at 25,850, compared to 1,226 in Arrington.
- The median age in South pasadena is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 31.3 years in Arrington.
- South pasadena has a higher median income of $127,882, compared to $58,144 in Arrington.
- In South pasadena, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 40.0% in Arrington.
- The poverty level is identical in both Arrington and South pasadena at 8%.
- South pasadena has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Arrington.
Demographics
Demographics Arrington vs South pasadena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arrington | South pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 41 | 4 |
| White | 59 | 31 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 34 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 19 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arrington vs South pasadena
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Arrington at 41% compared to 4% in South pasadena.
- Arrington has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 31% in South pasadena.
- In South pasadena, the Asian population stands at 34%, greater than 0% in Arrington.
- South pasadena has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 0% in Arrington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South pasadena at 12%, compared to 0% in Arrington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arrington and South pasadena at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arrington | South pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 11.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 13.8% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 6.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 42.4% | 20.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arrington vs South pasadena
- More residents in Arrington report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 11.9% in South pasadena.
- Depression is more prevalent in Arrington at 25.2% compared to 13.8% in South pasadena.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Arrington at 23.1% compared to 6.3% in South pasadena.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Arrington and South pasadena at 15.3%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Arrington at 42.4% compared to 20.9% in South pasadena.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South pasadena at 7.0% compared to 6.0% in Arrington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arrington | South pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (177) |
| High School Diploma | 17.0% (208) | 4.3% (1,111) |
| Less than High School | 21.2% (260) | 3.0% (766) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.1% (247) | 53.2% (13,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arrington vs South pasadena
- In South pasadena, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Arrington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arrington hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 4.3% in South pasadena.
- More residents in Arrington have less than a high school education at 21.2% compared to 3.0% in South pasadena.
- In South pasadena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.2% compared to 20.1% in Arrington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.