Demographics details for Arrington, VA vs Muldraugh, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arrington, VA vs Muldraugh, KY.
Data | Arrington | Muldraugh |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,226 | 1,019 |
Median Age | 31.3 years | 39.6 years |
Median Income | $58,144 | $49,375 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Arrington vs Muldraugh
- In Arrington, the population is higher at 1,226, compared to 1,019 in Muldraugh.
- The median age in Muldraugh is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 31.3 years in Arrington.
- Arrington has a higher median income of $58,144 compared to $49,375 in Muldraugh.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Arrington at 40.0% compared to 25.0% in Muldraugh.
- The poverty level is higher in Muldraugh at 15%, compared to 8% in Arrington.
- The unemployment rate in Arrington is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Muldraugh.
Demographics
Demographics Arrington vs Muldraugh provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Arrington | Muldraugh |
---|---|---|
Black | 41 | 4 |
White | 59 | 83 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 9 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arrington vs Muldraugh
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Arrington at 41% compared to 4% in Muldraugh.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Muldraugh at 83% compared to 59% in Arrington.
- Both Arrington and Muldraugh have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Muldraugh has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Arrington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Muldraugh at 4%, compared to 0% in Arrington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arrington and Muldraugh at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Arrington | Muldraugh |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 21.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 16.6% |
Depression | 25.2% | 30.2% |
Smoking | 23.1% | 27.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 13.6% |
Obesity | 42.4% | 42.3% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 40.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arrington vs Muldraugh
- In Muldraugh, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 19.7% in Arrington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Muldraugh at 30.2% versus 25.2% in Arrington.
- Muldraugh has a higher smoking rate at 27.7% compared to 23.1% in Arrington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Arrington at 15.3% compared to 13.6% in Muldraugh.
- Obesity rates are higher in Arrington at 42.4% compared to 42.3% in Muldraugh.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Muldraugh at 40.0% compared to 6.0% in Arrington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Arrington | Muldraugh |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (208) | 36.4% (371) |
Less than High School | 21.2% (260) | 13.7% (140) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.1% (247) | 5.1% (52) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arrington vs Muldraugh
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Arrington and Muldraugh at 0.0%.
- In Muldraugh, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 36.4% compared to 17.0% in Arrington.
- More residents in Arrington have less than a high school education at 21.2% compared to 13.7% in Muldraugh.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.1% compared to 5.1% in Muldraugh.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.