Demographics details for Arrington, VA vs Broadalbin, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Arrington, VA vs Broadalbin, NY.

Data Arrington Broadalbin
Population 1,226 5,158
Median Age 31.3 years 40.0 years
Median Income $58,144 $60,000
Married Families 40.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 8% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Arrington vs Broadalbin

  • The population in Broadalbin is higher at 5,158, compared to 1,226 in Arrington.
  • The median age in Broadalbin is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 31.3 years in Arrington.
  • Broadalbin has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $58,144 in Arrington.
  • In Broadalbin, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 40.0% in Arrington.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Arrington and Broadalbin at 8%.
  • Broadalbin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Arrington.

Demographics

Demographics Arrington vs Broadalbin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Arrington Broadalbin
Black 41 Data is updating
White 59 95
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 2
Two or More Races Data is updating 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Arrington vs Broadalbin

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Arrington at 41% compared to 0% in Broadalbin.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Broadalbin at 95% compared to 59% in Arrington.
  • In Broadalbin, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Arrington.
  • Broadalbin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Arrington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Broadalbin at 2%, compared to 0% in Arrington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arrington and Broadalbin at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Arrington Broadalbin
Mental Health Not Good 19.7% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 14.0% Data is updating%
Depression 25.2% Data is updating%
Smoking 23.1% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 15.3% Data is updating%
Obesity 42.4% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 6.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Arrington vs Broadalbin

  • More residents in Arrington report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Arrington at 25.2% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Arrington at 23.1% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Arrington at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Arrington at 42.4% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Arrington at 6.0% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Arrington Broadalbin
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 17.0% (208) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 21.2% (260) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.1% (247) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Arrington vs Broadalbin

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Arrington and Broadalbin at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Arrington hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
  • More residents in Arrington have less than a high school education at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Arrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.