Demographics details for Arnett, WV vs Loves park, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Arnett, WV vs Loves park, IL.

Data Arnett Loves park
Population 59 23,365
Median Age 42.0 years 36.6 years
Median Income $35,000 $56,370
Married Families 24.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 35% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.6

Population Comparison: Arnett vs Loves park

  • The population in Loves park is higher at 23,365, compared to 59 in Arnett.
  • Residents in Arnett have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
  • Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370, compared to $35,000 in Arnett.
  • In Loves park, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 24.0% in Arnett.
  • Arnett has a higher poverty level at 35% compared to 9% in Loves park.
  • The unemployment rate in Arnett is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.6% in Loves park.

Demographics

Demographics Arnett vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Arnett Loves park
Black Data is updating 7
White 100 71
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic Data is updating 10
Two or More Races Data is updating 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Arnett vs Loves park

  • In Loves park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Arnett.
  • Arnett has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 71% in Loves park.
  • In Loves park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Arnett.
  • Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 0% in Arnett.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 0% in Arnett.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arnett and Loves park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Arnett Loves park
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.3%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 11.3%
Depression Data is updating% 21.3%
Smoking Data is updating% 17.0%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 17.0%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.4%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Arnett vs Loves park

  • In Loves park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Loves park at 21.3% versus 0.0% in Arnett.
  • Loves park has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
  • Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Arnett Loves park
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (97)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.1% (3,994)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 9.7% (2,262)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.4% (4,064)

Education Levels Comparison: Arnett vs Loves park

  • In Loves park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
  • In Loves park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Loves park at 9.7%, compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
  • In Loves park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.