Demographics details for Armona, CA vs Union city, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Armona, CA vs Union city, GA.
| Data | Armona | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,367 | 27,895 |
| Median Age | 26.4 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $55,197 | $46,696 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Armona vs Union city
- The population in Union city is higher at 27,895, compared to 4,367 in Armona.
- The median age in Union city is higher at 32.7 years, compared to 26.4 years in Armona.
- Armona has a higher median income of $55,197 compared to $46,696 in Union city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Armona at 31.0% compared to 17.0% in Union city.
- The poverty level is higher in Union city at 16%, compared to 15% in Armona.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 4.5% in Armona.
Demographics
Demographics Armona vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Armona | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 85 |
| White | -1 | 6 |
| Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 78 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Armona vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 85% compared to 1% in Armona.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Union city at 6% compared to -1% in Armona.
- The Asian population is larger in Armona at 8% compared to 0% in Union city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Armona at 78% compared to 5% in Union city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Armona at 12% compared to 4% in Union city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Armona at 2% compared to 0% in Union city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Armona | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 19.5% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 35.5% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Armona vs Union city
- More residents in Armona report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.7% in Union city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Armona at 19.5% compared to 17.2% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 14.7% in Armona.
- Binge drinking is more common in Armona at 15.5% compared to 13.5% in Union city.
- Union city has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 35.5% in Armona.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union city at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Armona.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Armona | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (51) | 0.5% (129) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (686) | 13.2% (3,681) |
| Less than High School | 35.2% (1,537) | 7.8% (2,166) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.2% (183) | 17.3% (4,828) |
Education Levels Comparison: Armona vs Union city
- A higher percentage of residents in Armona have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Armona hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 13.2% in Union city.
- More residents in Armona have less than a high school education at 35.2% compared to 7.8% in Union city.
- In Union city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 4.2% in Armona.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.