Demographics details for Armona, CA vs Frankfort, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Armona, CA vs Frankfort, KY.
| Data | Armona | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,367 | 28,391 |
| Median Age | 26.4 years | 34.2 years |
| Median Income | $55,197 | $53,905 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Armona vs Frankfort
- The population in Frankfort is higher at 28,391, compared to 4,367 in Armona.
- The median age in Frankfort is higher at 34.2 years, compared to 26.4 years in Armona.
- Armona has a higher median income of $55,197 compared to $53,905 in Frankfort.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Armona and Frankfort at 31.0%.
- Armona has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Frankfort.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Armona and Frankfort at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Armona vs Frankfort provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Armona | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 12 |
| White | -1 | 71 |
| Asian | 8 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 78 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 8 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Armona vs Frankfort
- In Frankfort, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Armona.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Frankfort at 71% compared to -1% in Armona.
- The Asian population is larger in Armona at 8% compared to 3% in Frankfort.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Armona at 78% compared to 6% in Frankfort.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Armona at 12% compared to 8% in Frankfort.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Armona at 2% compared to 0% in Frankfort.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Armona | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 19.5% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 19.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 35.5% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Armona vs Frankfort
- In Frankfort, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.6% in Armona.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Frankfort at 26.4% versus 19.5% in Armona.
- Frankfort has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 14.7% in Armona.
- Binge drinking is more common in Armona at 15.5% compared to 14.5% in Frankfort.
- Frankfort has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 35.5% in Armona.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Frankfort at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Armona.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Armona | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (51) | 0.3% (89) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (686) | 15.3% (4,339) |
| Less than High School | 35.2% (1,537) | 11.5% (3,279) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.2% (183) | 18.7% (5,295) |
Education Levels Comparison: Armona vs Frankfort
- A higher percentage of residents in Armona have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Frankfort.
- A higher percentage of residents in Armona hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 15.3% in Frankfort.
- More residents in Armona have less than a high school education at 35.2% compared to 11.5% in Frankfort.
- In Frankfort, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 4.2% in Armona.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.