Demographics details for Arma, KS vs Carrollton, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arma, KS vs Carrollton, TX.
Data | Arma | Carrollton |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,399 | 133,820 |
Median Age | 53.0 years | 38.6 years |
Median Income | $38,947 | $95,380 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Arma vs Carrollton
- The population in Carrollton is higher at 133,820, compared to 1,399 in Arma.
- Residents in Arma have a higher median age of 53.0 years compared to 38.6 years in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has a higher median income of $95,380, compared to $38,947 in Arma.
- In Carrollton, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 33.0% in Arma.
- Arma has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Carrollton.
- The unemployment rate in Arma is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.7% in Carrollton.
Demographics
Demographics Arma vs Carrollton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Arma | Carrollton |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 10 |
White | 90 | 31 |
Asian | Data is updating | 15 |
Hispanic | 5 | 32 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arma vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 1% in Arma.
- Arma has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 31% in Carrollton.
- In Carrollton, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 0% in Arma.
- Carrollton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 5% in Arma.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carrollton at 12%, compared to 3% in Arma.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Arma at 1% compared to 0% in Carrollton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Arma | Carrollton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 10.1% |
Depression | 25.3% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 23.7% | 13.5% |
Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 41.9% | 31.5% |
Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arma vs Carrollton
- More residents in Arma report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.1% in Carrollton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Arma at 25.3% compared to 20.9% in Carrollton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Arma at 23.7% compared to 13.5% in Carrollton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Arma at 21.0% compared to 17.7% in Carrollton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Arma at 41.9% compared to 31.5% in Carrollton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Arma at 28.0% compared to 7.0% in Carrollton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Arma | Carrollton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (11) | 1.6% (2,169) |
High School Diploma | 25.4% (356) | 12.3% (16,432) |
Less than High School | 8.4% (118) | 13.2% (17,673) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (181) | 29.8% (39,921) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arma vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.8% in Arma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arma hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 12.3% in Carrollton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carrollton at 13.2%, compared to 8.4% in Arma.
- In Carrollton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.8% compared to 12.9% in Arma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.