Demographics details for Arlington, TX vs Livermore, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arlington, TX vs Livermore, CA.
| Data | Arlington | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 394,602 | 84,701 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $71,736 | $152,590 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Arlington vs Livermore
- In Arlington, the population is higher at 394,602, compared to 84,701 in Livermore.
- The median age in Livermore is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 33.1 years in Arlington.
- Livermore has a higher median income of $152,590, compared to $71,736 in Arlington.
- In Livermore, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 36.0% in Arlington.
- Arlington has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Livermore.
- The unemployment rate in Arlington is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.9% in Livermore.
Demographics
Demographics Arlington vs Livermore provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arlington | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 2 |
| White | 25 | 44 |
| Asian | 7 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Arlington vs Livermore
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Arlington at 23% compared to 2% in Livermore.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Livermore at 44% compared to 25% in Arlington.
- In Livermore, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 7% in Arlington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arlington at 30% compared to 23% in Livermore.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Arlington at 14% compared to 13% in Livermore.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arlington and Livermore at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arlington | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 26.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arlington vs Livermore
- More residents in Arlington report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.9% in Livermore.
- Depression is more prevalent in Arlington at 22.3% compared to 19.6% in Livermore.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Arlington at 15.8% compared to 9.4% in Livermore.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Livermore at 18.4% compared to 16.2% in Arlington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Arlington at 35.2% compared to 26.6% in Livermore.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Arlington and Livermore at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arlington | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (6,992) | 1.4% (1,173) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (48,867) | 9.5% (8,051) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (61,670) | 7.8% (6,576) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.3% (80,261) | 35.4% (30,013) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arlington vs Livermore
- A higher percentage of residents in Arlington have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.4% in Livermore.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arlington hold a high school diploma at 12.4% compared to 9.5% in Livermore.
- More residents in Arlington have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 7.8% in Livermore.
- In Livermore, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 20.3% in Arlington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.