Demographics details for Arlington, MA vs Upper darby, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Arlington, MA vs Upper darby, PA.

Data Arlington Upper darby
Population 45,906 85,217
Median Age 40.7 years 35.7 years
Median Income $136,312 $67,579
Married Families 45.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 3% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 5.2

Population Comparison: Arlington vs Upper darby

  • The population in Upper darby is higher at 85,217, compared to 45,906 in Arlington.
  • Residents in Arlington have a higher median age of 40.7 years compared to 35.7 years in Upper darby.
  • Arlington has a higher median income of $136,312 compared to $67,579 in Upper darby.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Arlington at 45.0% compared to 34.0% in Upper darby.
  • The poverty level is higher in Upper darby at 9%, compared to 3% in Arlington.
  • Upper darby has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in Arlington.

Demographics

Demographics Arlington vs Upper darby provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Arlington Upper darby
Black 3 34
White 73 39
Asian 13 12
Hispanic 5 9
Two or More Races 6 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Arlington vs Upper darby

  • In Upper darby, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 3% in Arlington.
  • Arlington has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 39% in Upper darby.
  • The Asian population is larger in Arlington at 13% compared to 12% in Upper darby.
  • Upper darby has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Arlington.
  • Both Arlington and Upper darby have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arlington and Upper darby at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Arlington Upper darby
Mental Health Not Good 12.6% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 7.1% Data is updating%
Depression 20.1% Data is updating%
Smoking 7.8% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 19.4% Data is updating%
Obesity 22.3% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Arlington vs Upper darby

  • More residents in Arlington report poor mental health at 12.6% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Arlington at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Arlington at 7.8% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Arlington at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Arlington at 22.3% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Upper darby at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Arlington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Arlington Upper darby
No Schooling 0.6% (256) 1.4% (1,162)
High School Diploma 6.8% (3,120) 17.6% (14,973)
Less than High School 3.8% (1,725) 10.3% (8,806)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 54.6% (25,070) 22.2% (18,927)

Education Levels Comparison: Arlington vs Upper darby

  • In Upper darby, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Arlington.
  • In Upper darby, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 6.8% in Arlington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Upper darby at 10.3%, compared to 3.8% in Arlington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Arlington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.6% compared to 22.2% in Upper darby.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.