Demographics details for Arlington, MA vs Central square, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Arlington, MA vs Central square, NY.

Data Arlington Central square
Population 45,906 1,852
Median Age 40.7 years 41.0 years
Median Income $136,312 $58,824
Married Families 45.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 3% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.2

Population Comparison: Arlington vs Central square

  • In Arlington, the population is higher at 45,906, compared to 1,852 in Central square.
  • The median age in Central square is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 40.7 years in Arlington.
  • Arlington has a higher median income of $136,312 compared to $58,824 in Central square.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Arlington and Central square at 45.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Central square at 8%, compared to 3% in Arlington.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Arlington and Central square at 4.2%.

Demographics

Demographics Arlington vs Central square provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Arlington Central square
Black 3 1
White 73 97
Asian 13 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 Data is updating
Two or More Races 6 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Arlington vs Central square

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Arlington at 3% compared to 1% in Central square.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Central square at 97% compared to 73% in Arlington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Arlington at 13% compared to 0% in Central square.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Arlington at 5% compared to 0% in Central square.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Arlington at 6% compared to 2% in Central square.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arlington and Central square at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Arlington Central square
Mental Health Not Good 12.6% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 7.1% 11.8%
Depression 20.1% 26.8%
Smoking 7.8% 21.2%
Binge Drinking 19.4% 19.3%
Obesity 22.3% 40.3%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Arlington vs Central square

  • In Central square, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 12.6% in Arlington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central square at 26.8% versus 20.1% in Arlington.
  • Central square has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 7.8% in Arlington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Arlington at 19.4% compared to 19.3% in Central square.
  • Central square has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 22.3% in Arlington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central square at 18.0% compared to 8.0% in Arlington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Arlington Central square
No Schooling 0.6% (256) 0.1% (1)
High School Diploma 6.8% (3,120) 14.2% (263)
Less than High School 3.8% (1,725) 11.0% (204)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 54.6% (25,070) 19.2% (356)

Education Levels Comparison: Arlington vs Central square

  • A higher percentage of residents in Arlington have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.1% in Central square.
  • In Central square, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 6.8% in Arlington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central square at 11.0%, compared to 3.8% in Arlington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Arlington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.6% compared to 19.2% in Central square.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.