Demographics details for Arkadelphia, AR vs Union springs, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arkadelphia, AR vs Union springs, AL.
| Data | Arkadelphia | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,258 | 3,242 |
| Median Age | 23.3 years | 28.1 years |
| Median Income | $37,634 | $24,921 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Arkadelphia vs Union springs
- In Arkadelphia, the population is higher at 10,258, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
- The median age in Union springs is higher at 28.1 years, compared to 23.3 years in Arkadelphia.
- Arkadelphia has a higher median income of $37,634 compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Arkadelphia at 23.0% compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Union springs at 25%, compared to 21% in Arkadelphia.
- Union springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Arkadelphia.
Demographics
Demographics Arkadelphia vs Union springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arkadelphia | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 31 | 69 |
| White | 58 | 4 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arkadelphia vs Union springs
- In Union springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 69% compared to 31% in Arkadelphia.
- Arkadelphia has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- Both Arkadelphia and Union springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Union springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 6% in Arkadelphia.
- Both Arkadelphia and Union springs have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arkadelphia and Union springs at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arkadelphia | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 16.9% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 20.7% | 25.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 11.1% |
| Obesity | 44.3% | 49.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arkadelphia vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 19.2% in Arkadelphia.
- Depression is more prevalent in Arkadelphia at 25.8% compared to 20.8% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 20.7% in Arkadelphia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Arkadelphia at 13.5% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Union springs has higher obesity rates at 49.5% compared to 44.3% in Arkadelphia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Arkadelphia at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Union springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arkadelphia | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (25) | 3.6% (117) |
| High School Diploma | 11.3% (1,157) | 15.1% (489) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (559) | 33.7% (1,092) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (1,598) | 7.3% (237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arkadelphia vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.2% in Arkadelphia.
- In Union springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 11.3% in Arkadelphia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union springs at 33.7%, compared to 5.4% in Arkadelphia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arkadelphia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.