Demographics details for Arkadelphia, AR vs Norfolk, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arkadelphia, AR vs Norfolk, CT.
Data | Arkadelphia | Norfolk |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,258 | 1,685 |
Median Age | 23.3 years | 52.0 years |
Median Income | $37,634 | $76,382 |
Married Families | 23.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 21% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Arkadelphia vs Norfolk
- In Arkadelphia, the population is higher at 10,258, compared to 1,685 in Norfolk.
- The median age in Norfolk is higher at 52.0 years, compared to 23.3 years in Arkadelphia.
- Norfolk has a higher median income of $76,382, compared to $37,634 in Arkadelphia.
- In Norfolk, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 23.0% in Arkadelphia.
- Arkadelphia has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 4% in Norfolk.
- The unemployment rate in Arkadelphia is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.7% in Norfolk.
Demographics
Demographics Arkadelphia vs Norfolk provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Arkadelphia | Norfolk |
---|---|---|
Black | 31 | Data is updating |
White | 58 | 87 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arkadelphia vs Norfolk
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Arkadelphia at 31% compared to 0% in Norfolk.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Norfolk at 87% compared to 58% in Arkadelphia.
- Both Arkadelphia and Norfolk have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arkadelphia at 6% compared to 4% in Norfolk.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Norfolk at 8%, compared to 4% in Arkadelphia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arkadelphia and Norfolk at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Arkadelphia | Norfolk |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 25.8% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 20.7% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 13.5% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 44.3% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arkadelphia vs Norfolk
- More residents in Arkadelphia report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
- Depression is more prevalent in Arkadelphia at 25.8% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Arkadelphia at 20.7% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
- Binge drinking is more common in Arkadelphia at 13.5% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
- Obesity rates are higher in Arkadelphia at 44.3% compared to 0.0% in Norfolk.
- Disability percentages are higher in Arkadelphia at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Norfolk.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Arkadelphia | Norfolk |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (25) | 0.2% (3) |
High School Diploma | 11.3% (1,157) | 16.3% (275) |
Less than High School | 5.4% (559) | 6.8% (115) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (1,598) | 36.2% (610) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arkadelphia vs Norfolk
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Arkadelphia and Norfolk at 0.2%.
- In Norfolk, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.3% compared to 11.3% in Arkadelphia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Norfolk at 6.8%, compared to 5.4% in Arkadelphia.
- In Norfolk, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 15.6% in Arkadelphia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.