Demographics details for Arkadelphia, AR vs Hopkins, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arkadelphia, AR vs Hopkins, SC.
| Data | Arkadelphia | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,258 | 1,738 |
| Median Age | 23.3 years | 53.9 years |
| Median Income | $37,634 | $57,262 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Arkadelphia vs Hopkins
- In Arkadelphia, the population is higher at 10,258, compared to 1,738 in Hopkins.
- The median age in Hopkins is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 23.3 years in Arkadelphia.
- Hopkins has a higher median income of $57,262, compared to $37,634 in Arkadelphia.
- In Hopkins, the percentage of married families is higher at 25.0%, compared to 23.0% in Arkadelphia.
- Arkadelphia has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The unemployment rate in Arkadelphia is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Hopkins.
Demographics
Demographics Arkadelphia vs Hopkins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arkadelphia | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 31 | 83 |
| White | 58 | 16 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arkadelphia vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 83% compared to 31% in Arkadelphia.
- Arkadelphia has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to 16% in Hopkins.
- The Asian population is larger in Arkadelphia at 1% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arkadelphia at 6% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Arkadelphia at 4% compared to 1% in Hopkins.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arkadelphia and Hopkins at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arkadelphia | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 20.7% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 44.3% | 44.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 34.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arkadelphia vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 19.2% in Arkadelphia.
- Depression is more prevalent in Arkadelphia at 25.8% compared to 18.8% in Hopkins.
- Hopkins has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 20.7% in Arkadelphia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hopkins at 16.0% compared to 13.5% in Arkadelphia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Arkadelphia at 44.3% compared to 44.2% in Hopkins.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 20.0% in Arkadelphia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arkadelphia | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (25) | 0.1% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 11.3% (1,157) | 20.8% (362) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (559) | 11.3% (197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (1,598) | 16.2% (281) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arkadelphia vs Hopkins
- A higher percentage of residents in Arkadelphia have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.1% in Hopkins.
- In Hopkins, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 11.3% in Arkadelphia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hopkins at 11.3%, compared to 5.4% in Arkadelphia.
- In Hopkins, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 15.6% in Arkadelphia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.