Environment details: Arcadia IN
Moderate quality; improvements possible.
Environment details: Laurel MT
poor quality, requires immediate attention.
Compare Environment: Arcadia IN vs Laurel MT
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Arcadia | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 1331 | 228 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Moderate quality; improvements possible. | poor quality, requires immediate attention. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.76 | 1.77 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 42 | 40 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Arcadia vs Laurel
- Water quality is rated higher in Arcadia at 5/10 compared to 4/10 in Laurel.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Laurel with an average index of 1.77 compared to 1.76 in Arcadia.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Arcadia at 42 compared to 40 in Laurel.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.