Demographics details for Arcadia, CA vs Sterling, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arcadia, CA vs Sterling, OK.
| Data | Arcadia | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 54,857 | 678 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $108,214 | $64,464 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Arcadia vs Sterling
- In Arcadia, the population is higher at 54,857, compared to 678 in Sterling.
- Residents in Arcadia have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 39.7 years in Sterling.
- Arcadia has a higher median income of $108,214 compared to $64,464 in Sterling.
- In Sterling, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 46.0% in Arcadia.
- The poverty level is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 9% in Arcadia.
- The unemployment rate in Arcadia is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.5% in Sterling.
Demographics
Demographics Arcadia vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arcadia | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 14 | 82 |
| Asian | 59 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arcadia vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Arcadia at 2% compared to 0% in Sterling.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling at 82% compared to 14% in Arcadia.
- The Asian population is larger in Arcadia at 59% compared to 1% in Sterling.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arcadia at 17% compared to 6% in Sterling.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling at 11%, compared to 8% in Arcadia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arcadia and Sterling at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arcadia | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 11.5% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 11.6% | 28.2% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.4% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 18.1% | 42.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 40.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arcadia vs Sterling
- In Sterling, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 11.5% in Arcadia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling at 28.2% versus 11.6% in Arcadia.
- Sterling has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 7.3% in Arcadia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling at 16.4% compared to 12.4% in Arcadia.
- Sterling has higher obesity rates at 42.3% compared to 18.1% in Arcadia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling at 40.0% compared to 10.0% in Arcadia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arcadia | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (927) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 11.8% (6,449) | 45.0% (305) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (4,055) | 11.2% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 40.5% (22,194) | 6.5% (44) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arcadia vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of residents in Arcadia have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- In Sterling, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 45.0% compared to 11.8% in Arcadia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling at 11.2%, compared to 7.4% in Arcadia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arcadia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.5% compared to 6.5% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.