Demographics details for Arcadia, CA vs Port gibson, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arcadia, CA vs Port gibson, MS.
| Data | Arcadia | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 54,857 | 1,206 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 47.3 years |
| Median Income | $108,214 | $24,773 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Arcadia vs Port gibson
- In Arcadia, the population is higher at 54,857, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
- The median age in Port gibson is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 44.1 years in Arcadia.
- Arcadia has a higher median income of $108,214 compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Arcadia at 46.0% compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- The poverty level is higher in Port gibson at 30%, compared to 9% in Arcadia.
- Port gibson has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.7% in Arcadia.
Demographics
Demographics Arcadia vs Port gibson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arcadia | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 82 |
| White | 14 | 12 |
| Asian | 59 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arcadia vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 82% compared to 2% in Arcadia.
- Arcadia has a higher percentage of White residents at 14% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- The Asian population is larger in Arcadia at 59% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arcadia at 17% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Arcadia at 8% compared to 6% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Arcadia and Port gibson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arcadia | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 11.5% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 11.6% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.4% | 10.2% |
| Obesity | 18.1% | 50.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arcadia vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 11.5% in Arcadia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port gibson at 20.0% versus 11.6% in Arcadia.
- Port gibson has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 7.3% in Arcadia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Arcadia at 12.4% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 18.1% in Arcadia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 10.0% in Arcadia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arcadia | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (927) | 0.5% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 11.8% (6,449) | 9.8% (118) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (4,055) | 13.3% (160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 40.5% (22,194) | 21.2% (256) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arcadia vs Port gibson
- A higher percentage of residents in Arcadia have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.5% in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arcadia hold a high school diploma at 11.8% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port gibson at 13.3%, compared to 7.4% in Arcadia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arcadia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.5% compared to 21.2% in Port gibson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.