Demographics details for Arcadia, CA vs Pea ridge, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arcadia, CA vs Pea ridge, AR.
| Data | Arcadia | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 54,857 | 7,852 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 35.6 years |
| Median Income | $108,214 | $93,113 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Arcadia vs Pea ridge
- In Arcadia, the population is higher at 54,857, compared to 7,852 in Pea ridge.
- Residents in Arcadia have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 35.6 years in Pea ridge.
- Arcadia has a higher median income of $108,214 compared to $93,113 in Pea ridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Arcadia at 46.0% compared to 42.0% in Pea ridge.
- Arcadia has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Pea ridge.
- The unemployment rate in Arcadia is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.5% in Pea ridge.
Demographics
Demographics Arcadia vs Pea ridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arcadia | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 4 |
| White | 14 | 70 |
| Asian | 59 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Arcadia vs Pea ridge
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Arcadia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pea ridge at 70% compared to 14% in Arcadia.
- The Asian population is larger in Arcadia at 59% compared to 1% in Pea ridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arcadia at 17% compared to 9% in Pea ridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pea ridge at 15%, compared to 8% in Arcadia.
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Arcadia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arcadia | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 11.5% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 11.6% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.4% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 18.1% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arcadia vs Pea ridge
- In Pea ridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 11.5% in Arcadia.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pea ridge at 25.0% versus 11.6% in Arcadia.
- Pea ridge has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 7.3% in Arcadia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pea ridge at 17.0% compared to 12.4% in Arcadia.
- Pea ridge has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 18.1% in Arcadia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pea ridge at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Arcadia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arcadia | Pea ridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (927) | 0.3% (23) |
| High School Diploma | 11.8% (6,449) | 17.7% (1,390) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (4,055) | 9.8% (773) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 40.5% (22,194) | 14.4% (1,131) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arcadia vs Pea ridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Arcadia have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.3% in Pea ridge.
- In Pea ridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 11.8% in Arcadia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pea ridge at 9.8%, compared to 7.4% in Arcadia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arcadia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.5% compared to 14.4% in Pea ridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.