Demographics details for Arapaho, OK vs Port huron, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arapaho, OK vs Port huron, MI.
Data | Arapaho | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Population | 654 | 28,626 |
Median Age | 38.1 years | 39.0 years |
Median Income | $37,361 | $47,906 |
Married Families | 51.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 7.0 |
Population Comparison: Arapaho vs Port huron
- The population in Port huron is higher at 28,626, compared to 654 in Arapaho.
- The median age in Port huron is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 38.1 years in Arapaho.
- Port huron has a higher median income of $47,906, compared to $37,361 in Arapaho.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Arapaho at 51.0% compared to 30.0% in Port huron.
- The poverty level is higher in Port huron at 15%, compared to 14% in Arapaho.
- Port huron has a higher unemployment rate at 7.0% compared to 3.5% in Arapaho.
Demographics
Demographics Arapaho vs Port huron provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Arapaho | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 8 |
White | 64 | 76 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 21 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
American Indian | 7 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arapaho vs Port huron
- In Port huron, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 2% in Arapaho.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Port huron at 76% compared to 64% in Arapaho.
- In Port huron, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Arapaho.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Arapaho at 21% compared to 7% in Port huron.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port huron at 8%, compared to 6% in Arapaho.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Arapaho at 7% compared to 0% in Port huron.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Arapaho | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 20.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 15.0% |
Depression | 24.5% | 28.2% |
Smoking | 20.6% | 25.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 44.9% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arapaho vs Port huron
- In Port huron, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 18.3% in Arapaho.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port huron at 28.2% versus 24.5% in Arapaho.
- Port huron has a higher smoking rate at 25.7% compared to 20.6% in Arapaho.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Port huron at 16.7% compared to 14.8% in Arapaho.
- Obesity rates are higher in Arapaho at 44.9% compared to 40.5% in Port huron.
- Disability percentages are higher in Arapaho at 26.0% compared to 22.0% in Port huron.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Arapaho | Port huron |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (172) |
High School Diploma | 41.6% (272) | 19.5% (5,596) |
Less than High School | 16.2% (106) | 13.5% (3,870) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.1% (27) | 12.8% (3,662) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arapaho vs Port huron
- In Port huron, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Arapaho.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arapaho hold a high school diploma at 41.6% compared to 19.5% in Port huron.
- More residents in Arapaho have less than a high school education at 16.2% compared to 13.5% in Port huron.
- In Port huron, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 4.1% in Arapaho.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.