Demographics details for Arapaho, OK vs Jurupa valley, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arapaho, OK vs Jurupa valley, CA.
| Data | Arapaho | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 654 | 107,609 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $37,361 | $91,562 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Arapaho vs Jurupa valley
- The population in Jurupa valley is higher at 107,609, compared to 654 in Arapaho.
- Residents in Arapaho have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562, compared to $37,361 in Arapaho.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Arapaho at 51.0% compared to 34.0% in Jurupa valley.
- Arapaho has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Arapaho.
Demographics
Demographics Arapaho vs Jurupa valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arapaho | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 64 | 8 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 71 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 13 |
| American Indian | 7 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Arapaho vs Jurupa valley
- In Jurupa valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Arapaho.
- Arapaho has a higher percentage of White residents at 64% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
- In Jurupa valley, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Arapaho.
- Jurupa valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 71%, compared to 21% in Arapaho.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jurupa valley at 13%, compared to 6% in Arapaho.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Arapaho at 7% compared to 1% in Jurupa valley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arapaho | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 38.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arapaho vs Jurupa valley
- More residents in Arapaho report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.7% in Jurupa valley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Arapaho at 24.5% compared to 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Arapaho at 20.6% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jurupa valley at 16.1% compared to 14.8% in Arapaho.
- Obesity rates are higher in Arapaho at 44.9% compared to 38.4% in Jurupa valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Arapaho at 26.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arapaho | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.1% (3,376) |
| High School Diploma | 41.6% (272) | 17.3% (18,582) |
| Less than High School | 16.2% (106) | 34.3% (36,892) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.1% (27) | 9.0% (9,706) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arapaho vs Jurupa valley
- In Jurupa valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.0% in Arapaho.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arapaho hold a high school diploma at 41.6% compared to 17.3% in Jurupa valley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jurupa valley at 34.3%, compared to 16.2% in Arapaho.
- In Jurupa valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.0% compared to 4.1% in Arapaho.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.