Demographics details for Arapaho, OK vs Forest, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Arapaho, OK vs Forest, MS.
| Data | Arapaho | Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 654 | 5,330 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $37,361 | $50,093 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Arapaho vs Forest
- The population in Forest is higher at 5,330, compared to 654 in Arapaho.
- Residents in Arapaho have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 36.4 years in Forest.
- Forest has a higher median income of $50,093, compared to $37,361 in Arapaho.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Arapaho at 51.0% compared to 35.0% in Forest.
- The poverty level is higher in Forest at 18%, compared to 14% in Arapaho.
- Forest has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Arapaho.
Demographics
Demographics Arapaho vs Forest provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Arapaho | Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 43 |
| White | 64 | 24 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 21 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
| American Indian | 7 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Arapaho vs Forest
- In Forest, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 43% compared to 2% in Arapaho.
- Arapaho has a higher percentage of White residents at 64% compared to 24% in Forest.
- Both Arapaho and Forest have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Forest has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 21% in Arapaho.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Arapaho at 6% compared to 3% in Forest.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Arapaho at 7% compared to 0% in Forest.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Arapaho | Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 16.8% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 26.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 45.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Arapaho vs Forest
- In Forest, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.3% in Arapaho.
- Depression is more prevalent in Arapaho at 24.5% compared to 21.2% in Forest.
- Forest has a higher smoking rate at 26.1% compared to 20.6% in Arapaho.
- Binge drinking is more common in Arapaho at 14.8% compared to 11.8% in Forest.
- Forest has higher obesity rates at 45.7% compared to 44.9% in Arapaho.
- Disability percentages are higher in Arapaho at 26.0% compared to 20.0% in Forest.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Arapaho | Forest |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 4.4% (232) |
| High School Diploma | 41.6% (272) | 10.5% (557) |
| Less than High School | 16.2% (106) | 33.4% (1,779) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.1% (27) | 8.5% (455) |
Education Levels Comparison: Arapaho vs Forest
- In Forest, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.4% compared to 0.0% in Arapaho.
- A higher percentage of residents in Arapaho hold a high school diploma at 41.6% compared to 10.5% in Forest.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest at 33.4%, compared to 16.2% in Arapaho.
- In Forest, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.5% compared to 4.1% in Arapaho.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.