Demographics details for Apopka, FL vs Viborg, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Apopka, FL vs Viborg, SD.
| Data | Apopka | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,017 | 824 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 50.3 years |
| Median Income | $87,394 | $46,316 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Apopka vs Viborg
- In Apopka, the population is higher at 57,017, compared to 824 in Viborg.
- The median age in Viborg is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 38.9 years in Apopka.
- Apopka has a higher median income of $87,394 compared to $46,316 in Viborg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Apopka at 41.0% compared to 31.0% in Viborg.
- The poverty level is higher in Viborg at 12%, compared to 9% in Apopka.
- The unemployment rate in Apopka is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Viborg.
Demographics
Demographics Apopka vs Viborg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Apopka | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 24 | Data is updating |
| White | 30 | 91 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Apopka vs Viborg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Apopka at 24% compared to 0% in Viborg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Viborg at 91% compared to 30% in Apopka.
- The Asian population is larger in Apopka at 4% compared to 0% in Viborg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Apopka at 27% compared to 4% in Viborg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Apopka at 15% compared to 4% in Viborg.
- In Viborg, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Apopka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Apopka | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 18.1% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 20.1% |
| Obesity | 29.8% | 35.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Apopka vs Viborg
- More residents in Apopka report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 13.8% in Viborg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Viborg at 18.1% versus 17.9% in Apopka.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Apopka at 18.5% compared to 17.4% in Viborg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Viborg at 20.1% compared to 14.7% in Apopka.
- Viborg has higher obesity rates at 35.2% compared to 29.8% in Apopka.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Viborg at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Apopka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Apopka | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (499) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (7,455) | 22.8% (188) |
| Less than High School | 12.3% (7,016) | 14.2% (117) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (13,353) | 14.6% (120) |
Education Levels Comparison: Apopka vs Viborg
- A higher percentage of residents in Apopka have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Viborg.
- In Viborg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 13.1% in Apopka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Viborg at 14.2%, compared to 12.3% in Apopka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Apopka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 14.6% in Viborg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.