Demographics details for Apopka, FL vs Saucier, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Apopka, FL vs Saucier, MS.
Data | Apopka | Saucier |
---|---|---|
Population | 57,017 | 1,199 |
Median Age | 38.9 years | 41.3 years |
Median Income | $87,394 | $67,742 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Apopka vs Saucier
- In Apopka, the population is higher at 57,017, compared to 1,199 in Saucier.
- The median age in Saucier is higher at 41.3 years, compared to 38.9 years in Apopka.
- Apopka has a higher median income of $87,394 compared to $67,742 in Saucier.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Apopka at 41.0% compared to 32.0% in Saucier.
- The poverty level is higher in Saucier at 11%, compared to 9% in Apopka.
- Saucier has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Apopka.
Demographics
Demographics Apopka vs Saucier provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Apopka | Saucier |
---|---|---|
Black | 24 | Data is updating |
White | 30 | 100 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 27 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 15 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Apopka vs Saucier
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Apopka at 24% compared to 0% in Saucier.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Saucier at 100% compared to 30% in Apopka.
- The Asian population is larger in Apopka at 4% compared to 0% in Saucier.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Apopka at 27% compared to 0% in Saucier.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Apopka at 15% compared to 0% in Saucier.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Apopka and Saucier at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Apopka | Saucier |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 12.6% |
Depression | 17.9% | 25.6% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 22.9% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 29.8% | 34.0% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Apopka vs Saucier
- In Saucier, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.9% in Apopka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Saucier at 25.6% versus 17.9% in Apopka.
- Saucier has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 18.5% in Apopka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Saucier at 16.3% compared to 14.7% in Apopka.
- Saucier has higher obesity rates at 34.0% compared to 29.8% in Apopka.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Saucier at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Apopka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Apopka | Saucier |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (499) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.1% (7,455) | 29.9% (359) |
Less than High School | 12.3% (7,016) | 6.3% (76) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (13,353) | 7.0% (84) |
Education Levels Comparison: Apopka vs Saucier
- A higher percentage of residents in Apopka have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Saucier.
- In Saucier, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.9% compared to 13.1% in Apopka.
- More residents in Apopka have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 6.3% in Saucier.
- A higher percentage of residents in Apopka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 7.0% in Saucier.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.