Demographics details for Apopka, FL vs Santa ana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Apopka, FL vs Santa ana, CA.
| Data | Apopka | Santa ana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,017 | 308,189 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $87,394 | $84,210 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Apopka vs Santa ana
- The population in Santa ana is higher at 308,189, compared to 57,017 in Apopka.
- Residents in Apopka have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 33.4 years in Santa ana.
- Apopka has a higher median income of $87,394 compared to $84,210 in Santa ana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Apopka at 41.0% compared to 35.0% in Santa ana.
- The poverty level is higher in Santa ana at 14%, compared to 9% in Apopka.
- Santa ana has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Apopka.
Demographics
Demographics Apopka vs Santa ana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Apopka | Santa ana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 24 | 1 |
| White | 30 | -5 |
| Asian | 4 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 78 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Apopka vs Santa ana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Apopka at 24% compared to 1% in Santa ana.
- Apopka has a higher percentage of White residents at 30% compared to -5% in Santa ana.
- In Santa ana, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 4% in Apopka.
- Santa ana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 78%, compared to 27% in Apopka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Apopka at 15% compared to 13% in Santa ana.
- In Santa ana, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Apopka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Apopka | Santa ana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 13.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 29.8% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Apopka vs Santa ana
- In Santa ana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.9% in Apopka.
- Depression is more prevalent in Apopka at 17.9% compared to 17.2% in Santa ana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Apopka at 18.5% compared to 13.4% in Santa ana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Apopka at 14.7% compared to 14.6% in Santa ana.
- Santa ana has higher obesity rates at 31.6% compared to 29.8% in Apopka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Apopka at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Santa ana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Apopka | Santa ana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (499) | 5.1% (15,819) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (7,455) | 14.7% (45,332) |
| Less than High School | 12.3% (7,016) | 42.9% (132,303) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (13,353) | 11.6% (35,860) |
Education Levels Comparison: Apopka vs Santa ana
- In Santa ana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.1% compared to 0.9% in Apopka.
- In Santa ana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.7% compared to 13.1% in Apopka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Santa ana at 42.9%, compared to 12.3% in Apopka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Apopka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 11.6% in Santa ana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.