Demographics details for Apopka, FL vs Norristown, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Apopka, FL vs Norristown, PA.
| Data | Apopka | Norristown |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,017 | 35,795 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $87,394 | $59,068 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Apopka vs Norristown
- In Apopka, the population is higher at 57,017, compared to 35,795 in Norristown.
- Residents in Apopka have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 32.4 years in Norristown.
- Apopka has a higher median income of $87,394 compared to $59,068 in Norristown.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Apopka at 41.0% compared to 26.0% in Norristown.
- The poverty level is higher in Norristown at 10%, compared to 9% in Apopka.
- The unemployment rate in Apopka is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.3% in Norristown.
Demographics
Demographics Apopka vs Norristown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Apopka | Norristown |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 24 | 33 |
| White | 30 | 19 |
| Asian | 4 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Apopka vs Norristown
- In Norristown, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 33% compared to 24% in Apopka.
- Apopka has a higher percentage of White residents at 30% compared to 19% in Norristown.
- The Asian population is larger in Apopka at 4% compared to 3% in Norristown.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Apopka and Norristown at 27%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Norristown at 16%, compared to 15% in Apopka.
- In Norristown, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Apopka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Apopka | Norristown |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 29.8% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Apopka vs Norristown
- In Norristown, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.9% in Apopka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Norristown at 20.3% versus 17.9% in Apopka.
- Norristown has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 18.5% in Apopka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norristown at 14.9% compared to 14.7% in Apopka.
- Norristown has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 29.8% in Apopka.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Norristown at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Apopka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Apopka | Norristown |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (499) | 1.3% (479) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (7,455) | 20.1% (7,193) |
| Less than High School | 12.3% (7,016) | 15.9% (5,695) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (13,353) | 14.4% (5,148) |
Education Levels Comparison: Apopka vs Norristown
- In Norristown, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.9% in Apopka.
- In Norristown, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.1% compared to 13.1% in Apopka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Norristown at 15.9%, compared to 12.3% in Apopka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Apopka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 14.4% in Norristown.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.