Demographics details for Apopka, FL vs Mountain pine, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Apopka, FL vs Mountain pine, AR.
| Data | Apopka | Mountain pine |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,017 | 577 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 44.2 years |
| Median Income | $87,394 | $28,542 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Apopka vs Mountain pine
- In Apopka, the population is higher at 57,017, compared to 577 in Mountain pine.
- The median age in Mountain pine is higher at 44.2 years, compared to 38.9 years in Apopka.
- Apopka has a higher median income of $87,394 compared to $28,542 in Mountain pine.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Apopka at 41.0% compared to 28.0% in Mountain pine.
- The poverty level is higher in Mountain pine at 20%, compared to 9% in Apopka.
- Mountain pine has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Apopka.
Demographics
Demographics Apopka vs Mountain pine provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Apopka | Mountain pine |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 24 | 8 |
| White | 30 | 85 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Apopka vs Mountain pine
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Apopka at 24% compared to 8% in Mountain pine.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mountain pine at 85% compared to 30% in Apopka.
- The Asian population is larger in Apopka at 4% compared to 0% in Mountain pine.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Apopka at 27% compared to 2% in Mountain pine.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Apopka at 15% compared to 5% in Mountain pine.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Apopka and Mountain pine at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Apopka | Mountain pine |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 29.8% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Apopka vs Mountain pine
- In Mountain pine, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 15.9% in Apopka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mountain pine at 26.8% versus 17.9% in Apopka.
- Mountain pine has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 18.5% in Apopka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mountain pine at 14.8% compared to 14.7% in Apopka.
- Mountain pine has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 29.8% in Apopka.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mountain pine at 23.0% compared to 10.0% in Apopka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Apopka | Mountain pine |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (499) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (7,455) | 30.8% (178) |
| Less than High School | 12.3% (7,016) | 9.4% (54) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (13,353) | 2.9% (17) |
Education Levels Comparison: Apopka vs Mountain pine
- A higher percentage of residents in Apopka have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Mountain pine.
- In Mountain pine, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.8% compared to 13.1% in Apopka.
- More residents in Apopka have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 9.4% in Mountain pine.
- A higher percentage of residents in Apopka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 2.9% in Mountain pine.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.