Demographics details for Apopka, FL vs Mansfield, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Apopka, FL vs Mansfield, OH.
Data | Apopka | Mansfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 57,017 | 47,865 |
Median Age | 38.9 years | 38.9 years |
Median Income | $87,394 | $40,996 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.8 |
Population Comparison: Apopka vs Mansfield
- In Apopka, the population is higher at 57,017, compared to 47,865 in Mansfield.
- The median age is the same in both Apopka and Mansfield at 38.9 years.
- Apopka has a higher median income of $87,394 compared to $40,996 in Mansfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Apopka at 41.0% compared to 25.0% in Mansfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Mansfield at 18%, compared to 9% in Apopka.
- Mansfield has a higher unemployment rate at 6.8% compared to 3.5% in Apopka.
Demographics
Demographics Apopka vs Mansfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Apopka | Mansfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 24 | 19 |
White | 30 | 69 |
Asian | 4 | 1 |
Hispanic | 27 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Apopka vs Mansfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Apopka at 24% compared to 19% in Mansfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mansfield at 69% compared to 30% in Apopka.
- The Asian population is larger in Apopka at 4% compared to 1% in Mansfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Apopka at 27% compared to 3% in Mansfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Apopka at 15% compared to 8% in Mansfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Apopka and Mansfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Apopka | Mansfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 14.9% |
Depression | 17.9% | 24.4% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 27.4% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 29.8% | 44.5% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Apopka vs Mansfield
- In Mansfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.9% in Apopka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mansfield at 24.4% versus 17.9% in Apopka.
- Mansfield has a higher smoking rate at 27.4% compared to 18.5% in Apopka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mansfield at 16.7% compared to 14.7% in Apopka.
- Mansfield has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 29.8% in Apopka.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mansfield at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Apopka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Apopka | Mansfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (499) | 1.0% (463) |
High School Diploma | 13.1% (7,455) | 23.0% (11,014) |
Less than High School | 12.3% (7,016) | 15.7% (7,522) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (13,353) | 11.2% (5,339) |
Education Levels Comparison: Apopka vs Mansfield
- In Mansfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Apopka.
- In Mansfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 13.1% in Apopka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mansfield at 15.7%, compared to 12.3% in Apopka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Apopka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 11.2% in Mansfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.