Demographics details for Apopka, FL vs Klamath falls, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Apopka, FL vs Klamath falls, OR.
| Data | Apopka | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,017 | 21,977 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $87,394 | $46,695 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Apopka vs Klamath falls
- In Apopka, the population is higher at 57,017, compared to 21,977 in Klamath falls.
- Residents in Apopka have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
- Apopka has a higher median income of $87,394 compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Apopka at 41.0% compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Klamath falls at 18%, compared to 9% in Apopka.
- Klamath falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Apopka.
Demographics
Demographics Apopka vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Apopka | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 24 | 1 |
| White | 30 | 69 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Apopka vs Klamath falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Apopka at 24% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Klamath falls at 69% compared to 30% in Apopka.
- The Asian population is larger in Apopka at 4% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Apopka at 27% compared to 15% in Klamath falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Apopka at 15% compared to 11% in Klamath falls.
- In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Apopka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Apopka | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 29.8% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Apopka vs Klamath falls
- In Klamath falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 15.9% in Apopka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Klamath falls at 28.4% versus 17.9% in Apopka.
- Klamath falls has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 18.5% in Apopka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Klamath falls at 15.8% compared to 14.7% in Apopka.
- Klamath falls has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 29.8% in Apopka.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Apopka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Apopka | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (499) | 0.9% (192) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (7,455) | 16.0% (3,508) |
| Less than High School | 12.3% (7,016) | 15.5% (3,401) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (13,353) | 14.4% (3,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Apopka vs Klamath falls
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Apopka and Klamath falls at 0.9%.
- In Klamath falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 13.1% in Apopka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Klamath falls at 15.5%, compared to 12.3% in Apopka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Apopka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 14.4% in Klamath falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.