Demographics details for Apopka, FL vs Fort morgan, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Apopka, FL vs Fort morgan, CO.
Data | Apopka | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
Population | 57,017 | 11,453 |
Median Age | 38.9 years | 32.8 years |
Median Income | $87,394 | $55,407 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Apopka vs Fort morgan
- In Apopka, the population is higher at 57,017, compared to 11,453 in Fort morgan.
- Residents in Apopka have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 32.8 years in Fort morgan.
- Apopka has a higher median income of $87,394 compared to $55,407 in Fort morgan.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Apopka at 41.0% compared to 39.0% in Fort morgan.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort morgan at 11%, compared to 9% in Apopka.
- The unemployment rate in Apopka is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Fort morgan.
Demographics
Demographics Apopka vs Fort morgan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Apopka | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
Black | 24 | 8 |
White | 30 | 16 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 27 | 49 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 23 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Apopka vs Fort morgan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Apopka at 24% compared to 8% in Fort morgan.
- Apopka has a higher percentage of White residents at 30% compared to 16% in Fort morgan.
- The Asian population is larger in Apopka at 4% compared to 0% in Fort morgan.
- Fort morgan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 27% in Apopka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort morgan at 23%, compared to 15% in Apopka.
- In Fort morgan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Apopka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Apopka | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 13.5% |
Depression | 17.9% | 21.7% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 18.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 29.8% | 29.3% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Apopka vs Fort morgan
- In Fort morgan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.9% in Apopka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort morgan at 21.7% versus 17.9% in Apopka.
- Fort morgan has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 18.5% in Apopka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort morgan at 17.6% compared to 14.7% in Apopka.
- Obesity rates are higher in Apopka at 29.8% compared to 29.3% in Fort morgan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Apopka at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort morgan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Apopka | Fort morgan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (499) | 4.3% (496) |
High School Diploma | 13.1% (7,455) | 16.0% (1,831) |
Less than High School | 12.3% (7,016) | 25.8% (2,957) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (13,353) | 11.5% (1,312) |
Education Levels Comparison: Apopka vs Fort morgan
- In Fort morgan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.9% in Apopka.
- In Fort morgan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 13.1% in Apopka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort morgan at 25.8%, compared to 12.3% in Apopka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Apopka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 11.5% in Fort morgan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.