Demographics details for Apalachicola, FL vs Kingsport, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Apalachicola, FL vs Kingsport, TN.

Data Apalachicola Kingsport
Population 2,395 56,150
Median Age 53.8 years 44.6 years
Median Income $61,322 $48,228
Married Families 35.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 18% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.2

Population Comparison: Apalachicola vs Kingsport

  • The population in Kingsport is higher at 56,150, compared to 2,395 in Apalachicola.
  • Residents in Apalachicola have a higher median age of 53.8 years compared to 44.6 years in Kingsport.
  • Apalachicola has a higher median income of $61,322 compared to $48,228 in Kingsport.
  • In Kingsport, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Apalachicola.
  • Apalachicola has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 13% in Kingsport.
  • Kingsport has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Apalachicola.

Demographics

Demographics Apalachicola vs Kingsport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Apalachicola Kingsport
Black 27 3
White 65 89
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 2 3
Two or More Races 5 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Apalachicola vs Kingsport

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Apalachicola at 27% compared to 3% in Kingsport.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Kingsport at 89% compared to 65% in Apalachicola.
  • Both Apalachicola and Kingsport have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Kingsport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Apalachicola.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Apalachicola at 5% compared to 4% in Kingsport.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Apalachicola and Kingsport at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Apalachicola Kingsport
Mental Health Not Good 17.4% 20.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 13.9%
Depression 19.8% 30.7%
Smoking 20.1% 22.2%
Binge Drinking 15.3% 13.8%
Obesity 37.8% 37.0%
Disability Percentage 30.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Apalachicola vs Kingsport

  • In Kingsport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.4% in Apalachicola.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Kingsport at 30.7% versus 19.8% in Apalachicola.
  • Kingsport has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 20.1% in Apalachicola.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Apalachicola at 15.3% compared to 13.8% in Kingsport.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Apalachicola at 37.8% compared to 37.0% in Kingsport.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Apalachicola at 30.0% compared to 21.0% in Kingsport.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Apalachicola Kingsport
No Schooling 1.0% (25) 0.6% (359)
High School Diploma 19.2% (461) 18.7% (10,481)
Less than High School 29.5% (707) 14.2% (7,995)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.2% (627) 21.6% (12,103)

Education Levels Comparison: Apalachicola vs Kingsport

  • A higher percentage of residents in Apalachicola have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Kingsport.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Apalachicola hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 18.7% in Kingsport.
  • More residents in Apalachicola have less than a high school education at 29.5% compared to 14.2% in Kingsport.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Apalachicola hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 21.6% in Kingsport.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.