Demographics details for Apalachicola, FL vs Centre, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Apalachicola, FL vs Centre, AL.
Data | Apalachicola | Centre |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,395 | 3,664 |
Median Age | 53.8 years | 54.5 years |
Median Income | $61,322 | $41,924 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Apalachicola vs Centre
- The population in Centre is higher at 3,664, compared to 2,395 in Apalachicola.
- The median age in Centre is higher at 54.5 years, compared to 53.8 years in Apalachicola.
- Apalachicola has a higher median income of $61,322 compared to $41,924 in Centre.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Apalachicola at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Centre.
- Apalachicola has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 14% in Centre.
- The unemployment rate in Apalachicola is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Centre.
Demographics
Demographics Apalachicola vs Centre provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Apalachicola | Centre |
---|---|---|
Black | 27 | 15 |
White | 65 | 81 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Apalachicola vs Centre
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Apalachicola at 27% compared to 15% in Centre.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Centre at 81% compared to 65% in Apalachicola.
- The Asian population is larger in Apalachicola at 1% compared to 0% in Centre.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Apalachicola at 2% compared to 1% in Centre.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Apalachicola at 5% compared to 3% in Centre.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Apalachicola and Centre at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Apalachicola | Centre |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 14.0% |
Depression | 19.8% | 26.4% |
Smoking | 20.1% | 22.6% |
Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 15.8% |
Obesity | 37.8% | 38.4% |
Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Apalachicola vs Centre
- In Centre, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.4% in Apalachicola.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Centre at 26.4% versus 19.8% in Apalachicola.
- Centre has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 20.1% in Apalachicola.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Centre at 15.8% compared to 15.3% in Apalachicola.
- Centre has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 37.8% in Apalachicola.
- Disability percentages are higher in Apalachicola at 30.0% compared to 22.0% in Centre.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Apalachicola | Centre |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (25) | 2.7% (100) |
High School Diploma | 19.2% (461) | 17.8% (651) |
Less than High School | 29.5% (707) | 29.0% (1,063) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.2% (627) | 10.9% (398) |
Education Levels Comparison: Apalachicola vs Centre
- In Centre, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.0% in Apalachicola.
- A higher percentage of residents in Apalachicola hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 17.8% in Centre.
- More residents in Apalachicola have less than a high school education at 29.5% compared to 29.0% in Centre.
- A higher percentage of residents in Apalachicola hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 10.9% in Centre.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.