Demographics details for Anza, CA vs Sulphur springs, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anza, CA vs Sulphur springs, TX.
Data | Anza | Sulphur springs |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,959 | 16,408 |
Median Age | 43.3 years | 39.4 years |
Median Income | $50,956 | $54,950 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Anza vs Sulphur springs
- The population in Sulphur springs is higher at 16,408, compared to 1,959 in Anza.
- Residents in Anza have a higher median age of 43.3 years compared to 39.4 years in Sulphur springs.
- Sulphur springs has a higher median income of $54,950, compared to $50,956 in Anza.
- In Sulphur springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 32.0% in Anza.
- The poverty level is higher in Sulphur springs at 15%, compared to 14% in Anza.
- Sulphur springs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Anza.
Demographics
Demographics Anza vs Sulphur springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Anza | Sulphur springs |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 14 |
White | 58 | 63 |
Asian | 14 | 1 |
Hispanic | 18 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Anza vs Sulphur springs
- In Sulphur springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 0% in Anza.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sulphur springs at 63% compared to 58% in Anza.
- The Asian population is larger in Anza at 14% compared to 1% in Sulphur springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Anza at 18% compared to 17% in Sulphur springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Anza at 9% compared to 5% in Sulphur springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Anza at 1% compared to 0% in Sulphur springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Anza | Sulphur springs |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.2% |
Depression | 19.9% | 24.8% |
Smoking | 15.6% | 20.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 37.1% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anza vs Sulphur springs
- In Sulphur springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.7% in Anza.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur springs at 24.8% versus 19.9% in Anza.
- Sulphur springs has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 15.6% in Anza.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sulphur springs at 17.5% compared to 17.1% in Anza.
- Sulphur springs has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 37.1% in Anza.
- Disability percentages are higher in Anza at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Sulphur springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Anza | Sulphur springs |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (127) |
High School Diploma | 9.4% (184) | 18.3% (3,003) |
Less than High School | 15.5% (304) | 16.0% (2,628) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (381) | 13.7% (2,248) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anza vs Sulphur springs
- In Sulphur springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Anza.
- In Sulphur springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 9.4% in Anza.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur springs at 16.0%, compared to 15.5% in Anza.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anza hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 13.7% in Sulphur springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.