Demographics details for Antlers, OK vs Upper darby, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Antlers, OK vs Upper darby, PA.
| Data | Antlers | Upper darby |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,198 | 85,217 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $27,798 | $67,579 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Antlers vs Upper darby
- The population in Upper darby is higher at 85,217, compared to 2,198 in Antlers.
- Residents in Antlers have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 35.7 years in Upper darby.
- Upper darby has a higher median income of $67,579, compared to $27,798 in Antlers.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Antlers at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Upper darby.
- Antlers has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 9% in Upper darby.
- Upper darby has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Antlers.
Demographics
Demographics Antlers vs Upper darby provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Antlers | Upper darby |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 34 |
| White | 63 | 39 |
| Asian | 1 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 6 |
| American Indian | 13 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Antlers vs Upper darby
- In Upper darby, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 3% in Antlers.
- Antlers has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 39% in Upper darby.
- In Upper darby, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 1% in Antlers.
- Upper darby has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Antlers.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Antlers at 15% compared to 6% in Upper darby.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Antlers at 13% compared to 0% in Upper darby.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Antlers | Upper darby |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 28.5% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 26.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 36.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Antlers vs Upper darby
- More residents in Antlers report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
- Depression is more prevalent in Antlers at 28.5% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Antlers at 26.4% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
- Binge drinking is more common in Antlers at 14.1% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
- Obesity rates are higher in Antlers at 40.5% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
- Disability percentages are higher in Antlers at 36.0% compared to 12.0% in Upper darby.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Antlers | Upper darby |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (23) | 1.4% (1,162) |
| High School Diploma | 23.4% (515) | 17.6% (14,973) |
| Less than High School | 26.2% (575) | 10.3% (8,806) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.7% (236) | 22.2% (18,927) |
Education Levels Comparison: Antlers vs Upper darby
- In Upper darby, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Antlers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Antlers hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 17.6% in Upper darby.
- More residents in Antlers have less than a high school education at 26.2% compared to 10.3% in Upper darby.
- In Upper darby, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.2% compared to 10.7% in Antlers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.