Demographics details for Antioch, CA vs Hopkins, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Antioch, CA vs Hopkins, SC.
| Data | Antioch | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 115,264 | 1,738 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 53.9 years |
| Median Income | $90,709 | $57,262 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Antioch vs Hopkins
- In Antioch, the population is higher at 115,264, compared to 1,738 in Hopkins.
- The median age in Hopkins is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 37.2 years in Antioch.
- Antioch has a higher median income of $90,709 compared to $57,262 in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Antioch at 36.0% compared to 25.0% in Hopkins.
- Antioch has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The unemployment rate in Antioch is higher at 6.0%, compared to 3.5% in Hopkins.
Demographics
Demographics Antioch vs Hopkins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Antioch | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 83 |
| White | 18 | 16 |
| Asian | 14 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 35 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Antioch vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 83% compared to 19% in Antioch.
- Antioch has a higher percentage of White residents at 18% compared to 16% in Hopkins.
- The Asian population is larger in Antioch at 14% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Antioch at 35% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Antioch at 13% compared to 1% in Hopkins.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Antioch at 1% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Antioch | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 18.2% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 13.3% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 28.9% | 44.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 34.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Antioch vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 16.5% in Antioch.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hopkins at 18.8% versus 18.2% in Antioch.
- Hopkins has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 13.3% in Antioch.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hopkins at 16.0% compared to 15.8% in Antioch.
- Hopkins has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 28.9% in Antioch.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 15.0% in Antioch.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Antioch | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (2,297) | 0.1% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (17,651) | 20.8% (362) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (18,983) | 11.3% (197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (17,721) | 16.2% (281) |
Education Levels Comparison: Antioch vs Hopkins
- A higher percentage of residents in Antioch have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.1% in Hopkins.
- In Hopkins, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 15.3% in Antioch.
- More residents in Antioch have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 11.3% in Hopkins.
- In Hopkins, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 15.4% in Antioch.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.