Demographics details for Antioch, CA vs Cherokee, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Antioch, CA vs Cherokee, OK.
| Data | Antioch | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 115,264 | 48,098 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $90,709 | $52,410 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Antioch vs Cherokee
- In Antioch, the population is higher at 115,264, compared to 48,098 in Cherokee.
- Residents in Antioch have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 36.5 years in Cherokee.
- Antioch has a higher median income of $90,709 compared to $52,410 in Cherokee.
- In Cherokee, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Antioch.
- The poverty level is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 12% in Antioch.
- The unemployment rate in Antioch is higher at 6.0%, compared to 4.6% in Cherokee.
Demographics
Demographics Antioch vs Cherokee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Antioch | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 1 |
| White | 18 | 42 |
| Asian | 14 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 35 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | 33 |
Demographics Comparison: Antioch vs Cherokee
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Antioch at 19% compared to 1% in Cherokee.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cherokee at 42% compared to 18% in Antioch.
- The Asian population is larger in Antioch at 14% compared to 1% in Cherokee.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Antioch at 35% compared to 8% in Cherokee.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 13% in Antioch.
- In Cherokee, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 33%, compared to 1% in Antioch.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Antioch | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 18.2% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 13.3% | 23.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 28.9% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Antioch vs Cherokee
- In Cherokee, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 16.5% in Antioch.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cherokee at 26.6% versus 18.2% in Antioch.
- Cherokee has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 13.3% in Antioch.
- Binge drinking is more common in Antioch at 15.8% compared to 13.8% in Cherokee.
- Cherokee has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 28.9% in Antioch.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cherokee at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Antioch.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Antioch | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (2,297) | 0.9% (433) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (17,651) | 15.6% (7,526) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (18,983) | 11.5% (5,552) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (17,721) | 17.9% (8,612) |
Education Levels Comparison: Antioch vs Cherokee
- A higher percentage of residents in Antioch have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.9% in Cherokee.
- In Cherokee, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.6% compared to 15.3% in Antioch.
- More residents in Antioch have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 11.5% in Cherokee.
- In Cherokee, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 15.4% in Antioch.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.