Demographics details for Andrews, TX vs Overland park, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Andrews, TX vs Overland park, KS.
Data | Andrews | Overland park |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,276 | 197,726 |
Median Age | 31.9 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $86,806 | $100,876 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Andrews vs Overland park
- The population in Overland park is higher at 197,726, compared to 13,276 in Andrews.
- The median age in Overland park is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 31.9 years in Andrews.
- Overland park has a higher median income of $100,876, compared to $86,806 in Andrews.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Andrews and Overland park at 44.0%.
- Andrews has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Overland park.
- The unemployment rate in Andrews is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.3% in Overland park.
Demographics
Demographics Andrews vs Overland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Andrews | Overland park |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 5 |
White | 26 | 74 |
Asian | 1 | 9 |
Hispanic | 54 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Andrews vs Overland park
- In Overland park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Andrews.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Overland park at 74% compared to 26% in Andrews.
- In Overland park, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Andrews.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Andrews at 54% compared to 7% in Overland park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Andrews at 16% compared to 5% in Overland park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Andrews and Overland park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Andrews | Overland park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 12.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 6.9% |
Depression | 23.1% | 18.3% |
Smoking | 17.5% | 9.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 19.7% |
Obesity | 38.4% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Andrews vs Overland park
- More residents in Andrews report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 12.2% in Overland park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Andrews at 23.1% compared to 18.3% in Overland park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Andrews at 17.5% compared to 9.6% in Overland park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Overland park at 19.7% compared to 17.9% in Andrews.
- Obesity rates are higher in Andrews at 38.4% compared to 28.6% in Overland park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Andrews at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Overland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Andrews | Overland park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.2% (428) | 0.5% (897) |
High School Diploma | 15.6% (2,070) | 7.1% (13,953) |
Less than High School | 27.9% (3,710) | 3.3% (6,590) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (1,773) | 43.1% (85,152) |
Education Levels Comparison: Andrews vs Overland park
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrews have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.5% in Overland park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrews hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 7.1% in Overland park.
- More residents in Andrews have less than a high school education at 27.9% compared to 3.3% in Overland park.
- In Overland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.1% compared to 13.4% in Andrews.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.