Demographics details for Andrews, TX vs Indian head, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Andrews, TX vs Indian head, MD.
| Data | Andrews | Indian head |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,276 | 4,025 |
| Median Age | 31.9 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $86,806 | $77,948 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Andrews vs Indian head
- In Andrews, the population is higher at 13,276, compared to 4,025 in Indian head.
- The median age in Indian head is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 31.9 years in Andrews.
- Andrews has a higher median income of $86,806 compared to $77,948 in Indian head.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Andrews at 44.0% compared to 24.0% in Indian head.
- Andrews has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Indian head.
- The unemployment rate in Andrews is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Indian head.
Demographics
Demographics Andrews vs Indian head provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Andrews | Indian head |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 62 |
| White | 26 | 26 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 54 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Andrews vs Indian head
- In Indian head, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 3% in Andrews.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Andrews and Indian head at 26%.
- In Indian head, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Andrews.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Andrews at 54% compared to 5% in Indian head.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Andrews at 16% compared to 3% in Indian head.
- In Indian head, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Andrews.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Andrews | Indian head |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 44.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Andrews vs Indian head
- More residents in Andrews report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.9% in Indian head.
- Depression is more prevalent in Andrews at 23.1% compared to 17.0% in Indian head.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Andrews at 17.5% compared to 16.4% in Indian head.
- Binge drinking is more common in Andrews at 17.9% compared to 15.1% in Indian head.
- Indian head has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 38.4% in Andrews.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Indian head at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Andrews.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Andrews | Indian head |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (428) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (2,070) | 27.9% (1,123) |
| Less than High School | 27.9% (3,710) | 4.5% (183) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (1,773) | 10.9% (437) |
Education Levels Comparison: Andrews vs Indian head
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrews have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in Indian head.
- In Indian head, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 15.6% in Andrews.
- More residents in Andrews have less than a high school education at 27.9% compared to 4.5% in Indian head.
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrews hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 10.9% in Indian head.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.