Demographics details for Andrews, TX vs Golden city, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Andrews, TX vs Golden city, MO.
| Data | Andrews | Golden city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,276 | 654 |
| Median Age | 31.9 years | 55.0 years |
| Median Income | $86,806 | $37,679 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Andrews vs Golden city
- In Andrews, the population is higher at 13,276, compared to 654 in Golden city.
- The median age in Golden city is higher at 55.0 years, compared to 31.9 years in Andrews.
- Andrews has a higher median income of $86,806 compared to $37,679 in Golden city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Andrews at 44.0% compared to 37.0% in Golden city.
- The poverty level is identical in both Andrews and Golden city at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Andrews is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Golden city.
Demographics
Demographics Andrews vs Golden city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Andrews | Golden city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 26 | 89 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 54 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Andrews vs Golden city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Andrews at 3% compared to 0% in Golden city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Golden city at 89% compared to 26% in Andrews.
- The Asian population is larger in Andrews at 1% compared to 0% in Golden city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Andrews at 54% compared to 3% in Golden city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Andrews at 16% compared to 6% in Golden city.
- In Golden city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Andrews.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Andrews | Golden city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 40.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Andrews vs Golden city
- In Golden city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.5% in Andrews.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Golden city at 25.1% versus 23.1% in Andrews.
- Golden city has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 17.5% in Andrews.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Golden city at 18.0% compared to 17.9% in Andrews.
- Golden city has higher obesity rates at 40.9% compared to 38.4% in Andrews.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Golden city at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in Andrews.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Andrews | Golden city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (428) | 2.6% (17) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (2,070) | 30.6% (200) |
| Less than High School | 27.9% (3,710) | 17.6% (115) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (1,773) | 12.8% (84) |
Education Levels Comparison: Andrews vs Golden city
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrews have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 2.6% in Golden city.
- In Golden city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.6% compared to 15.6% in Andrews.
- More residents in Andrews have less than a high school education at 27.9% compared to 17.6% in Golden city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrews hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 12.8% in Golden city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.