Demographics details for Andrews, TX vs Ephrata, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Andrews, TX vs Ephrata, WA.
| Data | Andrews | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,276 | 8,476 |
| Median Age | 31.9 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $86,806 | $57,958 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Andrews vs Ephrata
- In Andrews, the population is higher at 13,276, compared to 8,476 in Ephrata.
- The median age in Ephrata is higher at 33.4 years, compared to 31.9 years in Andrews.
- Andrews has a higher median income of $86,806 compared to $57,958 in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Andrews at 44.0% compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- The poverty level is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 10% in Andrews.
- The unemployment rate in Andrews is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Ephrata.
Demographics
Demographics Andrews vs Ephrata provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Andrews | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 26 | 63 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 54 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Andrews vs Ephrata
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Andrews at 3% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ephrata at 63% compared to 26% in Andrews.
- The Asian population is larger in Andrews at 1% compared to 0% in Ephrata.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Andrews at 54% compared to 25% in Ephrata.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Andrews at 16% compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Andrews and Ephrata at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Andrews | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 35.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Andrews vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.5% in Andrews.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ephrata at 27.0% versus 23.1% in Andrews.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Andrews at 17.5% compared to 17.0% in Ephrata.
- Binge drinking is more common in Andrews at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Ephrata.
- Obesity rates are higher in Andrews at 38.4% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- Disability percentages are higher in Andrews at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Andrews | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (428) | 0.8% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (2,070) | 17.7% (1,503) |
| Less than High School | 27.9% (3,710) | 14.4% (1,223) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (1,773) | 8.0% (677) |
Education Levels Comparison: Andrews vs Ephrata
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrews have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- In Ephrata, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 15.6% in Andrews.
- More residents in Andrews have less than a high school education at 27.9% compared to 14.4% in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrews hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.