Demographics details for Andrews, TX vs Aiken, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Andrews, TX vs Aiken, SC.
| Data | Andrews | Aiken |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,276 | 32,463 |
| Median Age | 31.9 years | 46.4 years |
| Median Income | $86,806 | $65,712 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Andrews vs Aiken
- The population in Aiken is higher at 32,463, compared to 13,276 in Andrews.
- The median age in Aiken is higher at 46.4 years, compared to 31.9 years in Andrews.
- Andrews has a higher median income of $86,806 compared to $65,712 in Aiken.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Andrews at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Aiken.
- The poverty level is higher in Aiken at 12%, compared to 10% in Andrews.
- Aiken has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Andrews.
Demographics
Demographics Andrews vs Aiken provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Andrews | Aiken |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 36 |
| White | 26 | 56 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 54 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Andrews vs Aiken
- In Aiken, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 36% compared to 3% in Andrews.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Aiken at 56% compared to 26% in Andrews.
- In Aiken, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Andrews.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Andrews at 54% compared to 3% in Aiken.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Andrews at 16% compared to 3% in Aiken.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Andrews and Aiken at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Andrews | Aiken |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 35.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Andrews vs Aiken
- More residents in Andrews report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.6% in Aiken.
- Depression is more prevalent in Andrews at 23.1% compared to 20.3% in Aiken.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Andrews at 17.5% compared to 15.5% in Aiken.
- Binge drinking is more common in Andrews at 17.9% compared to 16.5% in Aiken.
- Obesity rates are higher in Andrews at 38.4% compared to 35.7% in Aiken.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Aiken at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Andrews.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Andrews | Aiken |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (428) | 0.5% (150) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (2,070) | 14.3% (4,646) |
| Less than High School | 27.9% (3,710) | 7.3% (2,369) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (1,773) | 30.6% (9,923) |
Education Levels Comparison: Andrews vs Aiken
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrews have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.5% in Aiken.
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrews hold a high school diploma at 15.6% compared to 14.3% in Aiken.
- More residents in Andrews have less than a high school education at 27.9% compared to 7.3% in Aiken.
- In Aiken, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 13.4% in Andrews.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.