Demographics details for Andrew, IA vs Woodstock, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Andrew, IA vs Woodstock, MN.
| Data | Andrew | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 378 | 110 |
| Median Age | 39.8 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $61,613 | $53,804 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 68.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Andrew vs Woodstock
- In Andrew, the population is higher at 378, compared to 110 in Woodstock.
- Residents in Andrew have a higher median age of 39.8 years compared to 33.6 years in Woodstock.
- Andrew has a higher median income of $61,613 compared to $53,804 in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, the percentage of married families is higher at 68.0%, compared to 51.0% in Andrew.
- The poverty level is higher in Woodstock at 10%, compared to 9% in Andrew.
- Woodstock has a higher unemployment rate at 3.1% compared to 2.5% in Andrew.
Demographics
Demographics Andrew vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Andrew | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 98 | 95 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Andrew vs Woodstock
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Andrew and Woodstock at 0%.
- Andrew has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 95% in Woodstock.
- Both Andrew and Woodstock have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 2%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Andrew and Woodstock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Andrew | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 9.1% |
| Depression | 18.3% | 21.7% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 17.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.4% | 20.9% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Andrew vs Woodstock
- More residents in Andrew report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 14.4% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodstock at 21.7% versus 18.3% in Andrew.
- Woodstock has a higher smoking rate at 17.8% compared to 17.4% in Andrew.
- Binge drinking is more common in Andrew at 23.4% compared to 20.9% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Andrew at 35.2% compared to 34.6% in Woodstock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Andrew at 8.0% compared to 5.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Andrew | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (95) | 20.0% (22) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (44) | 14.5% (16) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (32) | 10.9% (12) |
Education Levels Comparison: Andrew vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Andrew.
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrew hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 20.0% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodstock at 14.5%, compared to 11.6% in Andrew.
- In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 8.5% in Andrew.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.