Demographics details for Andrew, IA vs Southaven, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Andrew, IA vs Southaven, MS.
| Data | Andrew | Southaven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 378 | 56,360 |
| Median Age | 39.8 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $61,613 | $72,513 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Andrew vs Southaven
- The population in Southaven is higher at 56,360, compared to 378 in Andrew.
- Residents in Andrew have a higher median age of 39.8 years compared to 35.4 years in Southaven.
- Southaven has a higher median income of $72,513, compared to $61,613 in Andrew.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Andrew at 51.0% compared to 37.0% in Southaven.
- The poverty level is higher in Southaven at 12%, compared to 9% in Andrew.
- Southaven has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.5% in Andrew.
Demographics
Demographics Andrew vs Southaven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Andrew | Southaven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 35 |
| White | 98 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Andrew vs Southaven
- In Southaven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 0% in Andrew.
- Andrew has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 55% in Southaven.
- In Southaven, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Andrew.
- Southaven has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Southaven at 4%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Andrew and Southaven at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Andrew | Southaven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 18.3% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.4% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Andrew vs Southaven
- In Southaven, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 15.2% in Andrew.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Southaven at 22.9% versus 18.3% in Andrew.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Andrew at 17.4% compared to 16.7% in Southaven.
- Binge drinking is more common in Andrew at 23.4% compared to 14.1% in Southaven.
- Southaven has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 35.2% in Andrew.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Southaven at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Andrew.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Andrew | Southaven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (658) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (95) | 15.8% (8,925) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (44) | 8.7% (4,879) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (32) | 16.0% (9,035) |
Education Levels Comparison: Andrew vs Southaven
- In Southaven, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Andrew.
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrew hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 15.8% in Southaven.
- More residents in Andrew have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 8.7% in Southaven.
- In Southaven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 8.5% in Andrew.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.