Demographics details for Andrew, IA vs Grand rapids, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Andrew, IA vs Grand rapids, MI.
| Data | Andrew | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 378 | 196,908 |
| Median Age | 39.8 years | 31.8 years |
| Median Income | $61,613 | $61,634 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Andrew vs Grand rapids
- The population in Grand rapids is higher at 196,908, compared to 378 in Andrew.
- Residents in Andrew have a higher median age of 39.8 years compared to 31.8 years in Grand rapids.
- Grand rapids has a higher median income of $61,634, compared to $61,613 in Andrew.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Andrew at 51.0% compared to 31.0% in Grand rapids.
- The poverty level is higher in Grand rapids at 14%, compared to 9% in Andrew.
- Grand rapids has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 2.5% in Andrew.
Demographics
Demographics Andrew vs Grand rapids provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Andrew | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 18 |
| White | 98 | 51 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Andrew vs Grand rapids
- In Grand rapids, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 0% in Andrew.
- Andrew has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 51% in Grand rapids.
- In Grand rapids, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Andrew.
- Grand rapids has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand rapids at 11%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
- In Grand rapids, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Andrew.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Andrew | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 18.3% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.4% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Andrew vs Grand rapids
- In Grand rapids, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.2% in Andrew.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grand rapids at 25.3% versus 18.3% in Andrew.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Andrew at 17.4% compared to 17.3% in Grand rapids.
- Binge drinking is more common in Andrew at 23.4% compared to 16.7% in Grand rapids.
- Obesity rates are higher in Andrew at 35.2% compared to 34.9% in Grand rapids.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand rapids at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Andrew.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Andrew | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (2,304) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (95) | 12.4% (24,420) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (44) | 12.2% (23,971) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (32) | 25.6% (50,441) |
Education Levels Comparison: Andrew vs Grand rapids
- In Grand rapids, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Andrew.
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrew hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 12.4% in Grand rapids.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grand rapids at 12.2%, compared to 11.6% in Andrew.
- In Grand rapids, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 8.5% in Andrew.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.